题目内容：
根据下面资料，回答题 Shareholders and Companies
In the last half of the nineteenth century "capital" and "labour" were enlarging and 31 their rival organizations on modern lines. Many an old firm was replaced by a limited liability company with a bureaucracy of salaried managers. The change met the technical 32 of the new age byengaging a large professional element and 33 the decline in efficiency that so commonly spoiledthe fortunes of family firms in the second and third 34 after the energetic founders. It was moreover a step away from individual initiative, towards collectivism and municipal and state-ownedbusiness. The railway companies, though still private business managed for the benefit of shareholders,were very unlike old family business. At the same time the great municipalities went intobusiness to supply lighting, trams and other 35 to the taxpayers.
The growth of the limited liability company and municipal business had important consequences. Such large, impersonal manipulation of capital and industry greatly 36 the numbers andimportance of shareholders as a class, an element in national life representing irresponsible wealthdetached from the land and the duties of the landowners ; and almost equally detached from the responsible management of business. All through the nineteenth century, America, Africa, India, Australia and parts of Europe were being 37 by British capital, and British shareholders were thusenriched by the world' s movement towards industrialisation. Towns like Bournemouth and Eastbourne 38 up to house large "comfortable" classes who had retired on their incomes, and whohad no relation to the rest of the community except that of drawing dividends and occasionally attending a shareholder's meeting to dictate their orders to the management. On the other hand "Shareholding" meant leisure and freedom which was used by many of the later Victorians for the highestpurpose of a great civilisation.
The "shareholders" as such had no knowledge of the lives, thoughts or needs of the workmenemployed by the company in which he held shares, and his influence on the relations of capital andlabour was not good.The paid manager acting for the company was in more direct relation with themen and their demands, but even he had seldom that familiar personal knowledge of the workmenwhich the employer had often had under the more patriarchal system of the old family business now
passing away. Indeed the mere size of operations and the 39 of workmen involved rendered suchpersonal relations impossible. Fortunately, however, the increasing power and organisation of the tradeunions, at least in all skilled trades, enabled to workmen to meet on equal terms the managers of thecompanies who employed them. The cruel 40 of the strike and lockout taught the two parties torespect each other's strength and understand the value of fair negotiation.
第（31）题选
参考答案：
答案解析：